IBKR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Robinhood Markets has a net margin of 9.22% compared to Interactive Brokers Group's net margin of 36.25%. Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity of 4.96% beat Robinhood Markets's return on equity of 21.41%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a consensus price target of $195.40, signalling upside risk potential of 5.91%. On the other hand Robinhood Markets has an analysts' consensus of $59.29 which suggests that it could grow by 9.66%. Given that Robinhood Markets has higher upside potential than Interactive Brokers Group, analysts believe Robinhood Markets is more attractive than Interactive Brokers Group.

Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 1.190, which suggesting that the stock is 19.012% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Robinhood Markets has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.54%. Robinhood Markets offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Interactive Brokers Group pays 12.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Robinhood Markets pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Interactive Brokers Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Interactive Brokers Group quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Robinhood Markets quarterly revenues of $927M. Interactive Brokers Group's net income of $213M is lower than Robinhood Markets's net income of $336M. Notably, Interactive Brokers Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.45x while Robinhood Markets's PE ratio is 30.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Interactive Brokers Group is 2.14x versus 15.27x for Robinhood Markets. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Morgan Stanley has a net margin of 9.22% compared to Interactive Brokers Group's net margin of 26.13%. Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity of 4.96% beat Morgan Stanley's return on equity of 13.75%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a consensus price target of $195.40, signalling upside risk potential of 5.91%. On the other hand Morgan Stanley has an analysts' consensus of $124.13 which suggests that it could grow by 1.84%. Given that Interactive Brokers Group has higher upside potential than Morgan Stanley, analysts believe Interactive Brokers Group is more attractive than Morgan Stanley.

Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 1.190, which suggesting that the stock is 19.012% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Morgan Stanley has a beta of 1.300, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.001%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.54%. Morgan Stanley offers a yield of 3.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.93 per share. Interactive Brokers Group pays 12.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Morgan Stanley pays out 45.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Interactive Brokers Group quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are smaller than Morgan Stanley quarterly revenues of $16.5B. Interactive Brokers Group's net income of $213M is lower than Morgan Stanley's net income of $4.3B. Notably, Interactive Brokers Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.45x while Morgan Stanley's PE ratio is 14.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Interactive Brokers Group is 2.14x versus 3.27x for Morgan Stanley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Charles Schwab has a net margin of 9.22% compared to Interactive Brokers Group's net margin of 34.1%. Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity of 4.96% beat Charles Schwab's return on equity of 13.33%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a consensus price target of $195.40, signalling upside risk potential of 5.91%. On the other hand Charles Schwab has an analysts' consensus of $89.10 which suggests that it could grow by 5.61%. Given that Interactive Brokers Group has higher upside potential than Charles Schwab, analysts believe Interactive Brokers Group is more attractive than Charles Schwab.

Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 1.190, which suggesting that the stock is 19.012% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.903, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.659%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.54%. Charles Schwab offers a yield of 1.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Interactive Brokers Group pays 12.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Charles Schwab pays out 38.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Interactive Brokers Group quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are smaller than Charles Schwab quarterly revenues of $5.6B. Interactive Brokers Group's net income of $213M is lower than Charles Schwab's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Interactive Brokers Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.45x while Charles Schwab's PE ratio is 25.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Interactive Brokers Group is 2.14x versus 7.55x for Charles Schwab. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Visa has a net margin of 9.22% compared to Interactive Brokers Group's net margin of 47.71%. Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity of 4.96% beat Visa's return on equity of 50.81%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a consensus price target of $195.40, signalling upside risk potential of 5.91%. On the other hand Visa has an analysts' consensus of $374.91 which suggests that it could grow by 6.73%. Given that Visa has higher upside potential than Interactive Brokers Group, analysts believe Visa is more attractive than Interactive Brokers Group.

Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 1.190, which suggesting that the stock is 19.012% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Visa has a beta of 0.957, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.345%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.54%. Visa offers a yield of 0.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Interactive Brokers Group pays 12.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Visa pays out 21.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Interactive Brokers Group quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are smaller than Visa quarterly revenues of $9.6B. Interactive Brokers Group's net income of $213M is lower than Visa's net income of $4.6B. Notably, Interactive Brokers Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.45x while Visa's PE ratio is 35.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Interactive Brokers Group is 2.14x versus 18.65x for Visa. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.